Planning the evaluation determining the evaluation questions. Dep standards 4 table of contents mission statement of the commission on dental accreditation 5 accreditation status definition 6 introduction 7 goals 9 education environment 12 definition of terms used in accreditation standards 17 accreditation standards for dental education programs 20 1 institutional effectiveness 20 2 educational program 23 21. For each step, there are a subset of standards that are generally most relevant to consider. Program evaluation standards the joint committee on standards for educational evaluation, 1994. Common evaluation questions asked at different stages of program development 15 table 2. Evaluation checklists the evaluation center western. A accuracy standards the accuracy standards are intended to ensure that an evaluation will reveal and convey technically adequate information about the features that determine worth or merit of the program being evaluated. It involves collecting and analyzing information about a programs activities, characteristics, and outcomes.
Purpose of program evaluation documents program outcomes, successes, weaknesses. The standards are recommended as criteria for judging the quality of program evaluation efforts in public health. Meta evaluation a critical assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of the evaluation itself e. In recent years, how ever, the interest in curriculum evaluation in particular has seemed to increase markedly. In the case of those departments or schools in which some programs are subject to evaluation by external accrediting groups, the scheduling of the evaluation may be. The sixyear development process relied on formal and informal needs assessments. What is evaluation one main goal of program evaluation is. This tool kit should be read in conjunction with the u. Metaevaluation a critical assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of the evaluation itself e. Effective program evaluation is a carefully planned and systematic approach to documenting the nature and results of program implementation. Head start program performance standards 45 cfr chapter xiii rin 0970ac63 department of health and human services administration for children and families.
Helping you use program evaluation standards most effectively. F1 practical procedures the evaluation procedures should be practical, to keep disruption to a minimum while needed information is obtained. The program evaluation standards 10 provided a foundation to conduct an ethical and quality evaluation. The program evaluation standards summary of the standards 1 utility standards the utility standards are intended to ensure that an evaluation will serve the information needs of intended users. Evaluation procedures should be practical and responsive to the way the program operates. Pdf the program evaluation standards download full pdf. It is anticipated that the accreditation standards for dental education programs will strengthen the teaching, patient care, research and service missions of schools. The standards are grouped into five specific categories. Evaluation ethics, politics, standards, and guiding principles international program for development evaluation training. Therefore it need a free signup process to obtain the book. The 30 standards are organized into the following four groups. Evaluations should use effective project management strategies.
Identified five major attributes and 30 standards to guide evaluations. Adhering to these steps and standards will allow an understanding of each program s context and will improve how program evaluations are conceived and conducted. The program evaluation standards sage publications inc. U1 evaluator credibility evaluations should be conducted by qualified people who establish and maintain credibility in the evaluation context. Early childhood curriculum, assessment, and program. For the last ten years, it has been used successfully to strengthen and harmonize evaluation practice and has served as a key reference for evaluators around the world.
Wa 39 iii contents message from the directorgeneral v. The program managers guide to evaluation, this updated edition explains what program evaluation is, why evaluation is important, how to conduct an evaluation and understand the results, how to report evaluation findings, and how to use evaluation results to improve programs that benefit children and families. Joint committee on standards for educational evaluations. Always update books hourly, if not looking, search in the book search column. Naeyc has set 10 standards for early childhood programs that can help families make the right choice when they are looking for a child care center, preschool, or kindergarten. These standards are national in scope and represent the minimum requirements expected for a dental education program. Comprehensive guidance and counseling program evaluation. A guide for evaluators and evaluation users pdf,, download ebookee alternative successful tips for a better ebook reading experience.
An evaluation checklist distills and clarifies relevant elements of practitioner experience, theory, principles and research to support evaluators in their work. The book is an invaluable resource for practicing evaluators, students, evaluation users, and clients. The third edition of the program evaluation standards was published in 2010. A guide for evaluators and evaluation users yarbrough, donald b. Utility standards ensure that an evaluation will serve the information needs of intended users. A guide for evaluators and evaluation users third edition bydonaldb.
The standards and criteria are also the foundation of the naeyc accreditation system for early childhood programs. The program evaluation standards download pdfepub ebook. Feasibility standards the feasibility standards are intended to ensure that an evaluation will be realistic, prudent, diplomatic, and frugal. Support what is proper, fair, legal, right and just in evaluations. For example, the institute of education sciences what works clearinghouse yields only two for the search term program results evaluation.
Program evaluation and evaluating community engagement. A1 program documentation the program being evaluated should be. The program evaluation standards 3rd edition request pdf. The book begins with an overview of the evaluation field and program evaluation standards, and proceeds to cover the most widely used evaluation approaches. Alcohol andor other drug program certification standards. Program evaluation the type of evaluation discussed in this section is an essential organizational practice for all types of community health and development work. Persons involved in or affected by the evaluation should be identified, so that their needs can be addressed. Dac guidelines and reference series quality standards for. Common designs for implementation or process evaluations 32. A1 program documentation the program being evaluated should. One way to do this is for the evaluator and program people to develop a very good description of. Evaluation of each academic unit is required and normally takes place every ten years. The steps and standards are used together throughout the evaluation process.
Ethics are a set of values and beliefs that guide choices. The evaluation process described below is designed to give you good information on your program and what it is doing for students, clients, the community and society. The program director must meet the requirements of section 00 of these standards and must otherwise fulfill the responsibilities set forth in these standards on behalf of the aod program. The program evaluation standards book yahrough et al. The framework comprises steps in program evaluation and standards for effective program evaluation. This description helps to identify how the program should lead to the. The dac quality standards for development evaluation reflect this evolving framework and provide a guide to good practice in development evaluation. Chapter 6 standards for nursing education programs section 1. Another concern centers on the perceived technical demands of designing and conducting an evaluation. First established in 1981 by the joint committee on standards for educational evaluation and updated most recently in 2011, the standards are the benchmarks used to address the quality of evaluation efforts yarbrough, 2011. There are more than 1 million books that have been enjoyed by people from all over the world. To achieve this, a basic familiarity with the program evaluation standards, or simply the standards, is essential. The united nations evaluation group uneg norms and standards for evaluation, adopted in 2005, has served as a landmark document for the united nations and beyond. Adhering to these steps and standards will allow an understanding of each programs context and will improve how program evaluations are conceived and conducted.
Evaluation information should serve the identified and emergent needs of stakeholders u5. Checklist of the program evaluation standards statements. Aea is one of those associations, and sends a representative to the joint committee. The purpose of this checklist version of the standards is to provide evaluation. Welcome,you are looking at books for reading, the the program evaluation standards, you will able to read or download in pdf or epub books and notice some of author may have lock the live reading for some of country. To earn accreditation, programs must meet all 10 standards. Propriety encourage adequate documentation of evaluations and a metaevaluative perspective focused on improvement and accountability for evaluation processes and products. Evaluation ethics, politics, standards, and guiding principles. The joint committee on standards for educational evaluation jcsee was founded in 1975 as a coalition of major professional associations concerned with the quality of evaluation.
In 1986, the evaluation network enet and the evaluation research society ers merged to create the american evaluation association. The feasibility standards are intended to increase evaluation effectiveness and efficiency. These thirty standards support the core attributes of evaluation quality. Early childhood curriculum, assessment, and program evaluation. With new evaluation designs and the inclusion of the latest literature from the field, this second edition is an essential update for professionals and students who want to stay current. The accuracy standards are intended to ensure that an evaluation will reveal and convey technically adequate information about the features that determine worth or merit of the program being evaluated. Program evaluation standards statements better evaluation.
Program director the individual responsible for the overall management of an alcoholism or drug abuse treatment or recovery program. G a draft of the site visit report, approved by the oard, shall be made b. The program evaluation standards ebook download free pdf. A1 program documentation the program being evaluated should be described and. Ers had previously adopted a set of standards for program evaluation published in new directions for program evaluation in 1982. Accreditation standards for dental education programs. The standards names and statements are reproduced below in checklist form with permission of the joint committee on standards for educational evaluation jc see. The intention of bringing these approaches together was to orchestrate a quality and. Evaluation is a process that critically examines a program. The dean of the college of education encourages continuous program evaluation and improvement, with an emphasis on identifying the strengths and weaknesses of online course offerings in the college.
Its purpose is to make judgments about a program, to improve its effectiveness, andor to inform programming decisions patton, 1987. The utility standards are intended to increase the extent to which program stakeholders find evaluation processes and products valuable in meeting their needs. Crossreference of steps and relevant standards cdcpdf pdf 36kb. It is a way to evaluate the specific projects and activities community groups may take part in, rather than to evaluate an entire organization or comprehensive community initiative. Program evaluation hiring and managing an outside evaluator, project managers responsibilities educate the evaluator about the project provide timely feedback update and inform the evaluator of project changes monitor the contract supervisor inhouse evaluation activities provide program expertise. Program evaluation standards, joint committee on standards for educational evaluation 65 appendix ii gao contact and staff acknowledgments 66 other papers in this series 67. Many of these new organizations have undertaken efforts to develop their own standards or to modify existing setsmost typically, the program evaluation standards of the joint committee on standards for educational evaluationfor use in their own cultural context. Both of these documents are actual evaluation studies, and do not provide explicit commentary on how to construct effective program evaluations and report their. Sage the standard names and statements, as reproduced below, are under to the jcsee and are approved as an american national standard. A guide for evaluators and evaluation users 3rd ed. The third edition can be purchased from a variety of.
5 1467 1410 578 1054 1566 281 1161 1320 457 436 812 810 734 439 1482 1403 1081 433 393 40 162 28 253 1414 51 302 686 808 1498 849 727 789